Approaches to auditing standards and their possible impact on auditor behavior

The development and existence of appropriate, high quality auditing standards is the fi rst step in the road to quality audits. Auditing standards serve several important purposes including defi ning what an audit is, promoting consistency, facilitating education, providing a means to judge performance, and, most of all, infl uencing auditor behavior. Standards also affect many of the other factors that impact auditor behavior such as inspections, enforcement and fi rm methodologies. Effective audit standards take account of the complex environment that infl uences auditor behavior and are designed to promote the sound exercise of professional judgment. However, standard setters take different approaches to the development of standards and signifi cant issues related to the role of judgment and to the level of prescription in the auditing standards remain. Audit standard setters have different views of the interplay between the role of standards and how they infl uence auditor behavior, and this infl uences the emphasis of the standards themselves. This article discusses the role of audit standards, various approaches used by current standard setters, the advantages and disadvantages of different approaches, and how such approaches may impact audit quality over time. The insights provided are based on professional experience and participation in the standard-setting process. Those involved in activities related to fi nancial reporting, auditing and standard-setting will be interested in reading this article. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance (2010) 7, 310 – 319. doi: 10.1057/jdg.2010.21 ; published online 16 September 2010